This is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Last Thursday, the FDA convened its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to discuss the future of covid vaccines.
The FDA is captured by Big Pharma and especially Pfizer. They do Pfizer’s bidding. When I say captured I mean captured like they have been imprisoned and must be friendly to the guards in hopes of being released. But they don’t realize that by being nice they have actually tightened the chains that keep them imprisoned and lost the trust of everyone fighting to be free.
A most helpful post Maryanne. It is times like this the world perhaps needs strong trade unions. A mass strike demanding the release of genuine data and safety focused recommendations might work. It is appalling to see how agencies like this can drag their heels and keep the world from accessing the information it really needs.
The ‘vaccine’ schedule here obscures the underlying motive: treating the mRNA platform as an equivalent to the older flu shot paradigm. Further, the apparent manufacturing issues, production standards and oversight of the predecessor shots has not been addressed. All of this treats the mRNA platform and manufacturing as if it is inevitable.
Surprising that Dr Paul Offit voted for boosters where as 4 months ago in this TWiF podcast he is putting booster shot evidence into perspective: https://youtu.be/fqtQAVRNowQ?t=384
Four months ago Offit said boosters are oversold and perhaps of minimal statistical significance, do not seem to be clinically significant, apart for the over 75y old.
Offit also thinks that COVID is not like flu. It most probably does not need yearly booster shots, (depending on whether worldwide studies are going to be done to prove otherwise).
With the bivalent booster (which Offit himself doesn't take) there seem to be more infections.
A vote of 21-0 in favor...imagine that. Under EUA, the FDA has no authority to do anything as it is the DOD running the show. Big pharma is the pawn in the game, the middle man. Big pharma farms out all its mRNA injection manufacturing and the level of safety and purity is highly suspect. Research is now done mostly at the college level.
After coming across material presented by Sasha Latypova, the fake pandemic and the resulting fake vaccines takes on a whole new scope of invention and direction.
Great post. FDA's continuing and unwarranted 'work from home' policy is intentional--how else to keep those water-cooler conversations from occurring? Because those 18,000 employees are 18,000 individuals, and of course, are not immune from the wreckage occurring from the c-19 gene therapy jabs. But how to verify and validate with their colleagues? Certainly not in recorded zoom calls or in (probably) monitored emails and/or phone calls.
The snake oil peddlers will NOT test their product, as it is a BIOWEAPON that knobbles the immune system of the recipient. Pfizer and Moderna are "Pleading the 5th" by remaining silent. It is now common knowledge that the mRNA bioweapons maim and kill people in their prime whilst PROMOTING the infection with covid - especially >4 boosters that are acting like desensitisation. I am not holding my breath for the Plandemic planners and perpetrators to be held to account.
In August 2020, FDA and CDC agents already knew that they were never going to need to collect, review, discuss, base decisions on, or produce efficacy or safety data for EUA products; that the EUA product program was “not likely” to produce useful information to benefit future patients; and that there would be “no systematic data collection” although “retrospectives studies may be conducted and published.”
A vote 21 to 0 in favour? Even when they must acknowledge many possible side effects and known deaths from this mRNA platform? Surely more prudent to halt the program as covid winds down to an endemic cold and investigate what went wrong? If the risk of severe side effect is 1 in 800 from covid vaccines, versus other products pulled from market for much less (such as 1976 swine flu vaccine pulled after 50 or so reported deaths and a 1 in 100,000 chance of serious event; Rotavirus vax 1 in 10,000 chance of serious adverse event also pulled... But here we are at 1 in 800 for covid vaccines and no caution?!!). The infiltration and corruption of the FDA is so blindingly obvious, and they don't seem to care how bad this looks.
the Secret contracts which Trump signed for Pfizer and presumably for Moderna were until 2035, irrespective of if they worked or not and the government is locked into them and they can't escape from the contracts, although it now appears to have been a DOD sysop from the start - so what do you really think?
The FDA is captured by Big Pharma and especially Pfizer. They do Pfizer’s bidding. When I say captured I mean captured like they have been imprisoned and must be friendly to the guards in hopes of being released. But they don’t realize that by being nice they have actually tightened the chains that keep them imprisoned and lost the trust of everyone fighting to be free.
A most helpful post Maryanne. It is times like this the world perhaps needs strong trade unions. A mass strike demanding the release of genuine data and safety focused recommendations might work. It is appalling to see how agencies like this can drag their heels and keep the world from accessing the information it really needs.
The ‘vaccine’ schedule here obscures the underlying motive: treating the mRNA platform as an equivalent to the older flu shot paradigm. Further, the apparent manufacturing issues, production standards and oversight of the predecessor shots has not been addressed. All of this treats the mRNA platform and manufacturing as if it is inevitable.
I think that’s the true pursuit.
Surprising that Dr Paul Offit voted for boosters where as 4 months ago in this TWiF podcast he is putting booster shot evidence into perspective: https://youtu.be/fqtQAVRNowQ?t=384
Four months ago Offit said boosters are oversold and perhaps of minimal statistical significance, do not seem to be clinically significant, apart for the over 75y old.
Offit also thinks that COVID is not like flu. It most probably does not need yearly booster shots, (depending on whether worldwide studies are going to be done to prove otherwise).
With the bivalent booster (which Offit himself doesn't take) there seem to be more infections.
A vote of 21-0 in favor...imagine that. Under EUA, the FDA has no authority to do anything as it is the DOD running the show. Big pharma is the pawn in the game, the middle man. Big pharma farms out all its mRNA injection manufacturing and the level of safety and purity is highly suspect. Research is now done mostly at the college level.
After coming across material presented by Sasha Latypova, the fake pandemic and the resulting fake vaccines takes on a whole new scope of invention and direction.
Great post. FDA's continuing and unwarranted 'work from home' policy is intentional--how else to keep those water-cooler conversations from occurring? Because those 18,000 employees are 18,000 individuals, and of course, are not immune from the wreckage occurring from the c-19 gene therapy jabs. But how to verify and validate with their colleagues? Certainly not in recorded zoom calls or in (probably) monitored emails and/or phone calls.
The snake oil peddlers will NOT test their product, as it is a BIOWEAPON that knobbles the immune system of the recipient. Pfizer and Moderna are "Pleading the 5th" by remaining silent. It is now common knowledge that the mRNA bioweapons maim and kill people in their prime whilst PROMOTING the infection with covid - especially >4 boosters that are acting like desensitisation. I am not holding my breath for the Plandemic planners and perpetrators to be held to account.
FDA panel member, now retired, Kathryn Edwards started receiving payments from Pfizer to review the harms caused by the jabs in April 2020.
Interesting August 2020 FDA slide deck:
https://www.fda.gov/media/154536/download
In August 2020, FDA and CDC agents already knew that they were never going to need to collect, review, discuss, base decisions on, or produce efficacy or safety data for EUA products; that the EUA product program was “not likely” to produce useful information to benefit future patients; and that there would be “no systematic data collection” although “retrospectives studies may be conducted and published.”
See table on p. 18 of the 22-p. slide deck.
Further analysis here:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/august-2020-elizabeth-sadove-presentation
A vote 21 to 0 in favour? Even when they must acknowledge many possible side effects and known deaths from this mRNA platform? Surely more prudent to halt the program as covid winds down to an endemic cold and investigate what went wrong? If the risk of severe side effect is 1 in 800 from covid vaccines, versus other products pulled from market for much less (such as 1976 swine flu vaccine pulled after 50 or so reported deaths and a 1 in 100,000 chance of serious event; Rotavirus vax 1 in 10,000 chance of serious adverse event also pulled... But here we are at 1 in 800 for covid vaccines and no caution?!!). The infiltration and corruption of the FDA is so blindingly obvious, and they don't seem to care how bad this looks.
the Secret contracts which Trump signed for Pfizer and presumably for Moderna were until 2035, irrespective of if they worked or not and the government is locked into them and they can't escape from the contracts, although it now appears to have been a DOD sysop from the start - so what do you really think?