16 Comments

One can’t help but wonder if these platforms don’t know that asymmetric censorship fuels ‘conspiracy theories’, or if they simply don’t care.

It’s plainly obvious that the censorship is a) happening and b) one-sided. That these platforms continue to cloak their actions in vague references to obtuse community guidelines leaves the rest of us to speculate as to why...

Expand full comment

Yes, and who owns LinkedIn -> Microsoft -> Gates. No wonder it censors truth about the vaccines. Can't have the truth getting on the way of profit.

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by Maryanne Demasi, PhD

I'm sure a jury would agree with you, but then again, you can't sue because censorship is allowed by private companies. However, that doesn't make it wise. Perhaps if you simply provide a link to your work on LinkedIn with a minimal description, the Algorithm police won't catch you. I noticed that Dr. Paul Offit recently posted this on LinkedIn: "We don't need universal booster shots," and it's not the first time he's made such remarks there, yet he hasn't been cancelled. I guess it's tough to cancel somebody who makes such remarks when they invented a vaccine, authored the "vaccine bible" used in Medical Schools, and is on the FDA vaccine advisory panel! Just to be clear, Dr. Offit doesn't have concerns per se about the safety of the booster. He just thinks most people don't need them (but some do), and he'd like to see more efficacy data. Also, he'd prefer to focus efforts on vaccinating those who remain unvaccinated, here and around the world. Perhaps next time, quote Dr. Offit, and be sure to include a link to his LinkedIn profile!

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Wow, you really have a knack for upsetting all the right people - Linked-In, the ABC 'Science' Unit, etc. You must definitely be on to something!

I remember you from your ABC days and enjoyed your investigative reporting. Sadly, I can't bear to watch that media travesty any more.

Glad to have you here on Substack with the rest of the Deplorables.

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Love your work have pushed your study on the criminality of our regulatory authorities as widely as I can. https://warrenross.substack.com/p/a-pharmacist-sets-me-straight

Expand full comment

Absolutely shameful, Orwellian behaviour from the bully boys in big tech yet again. These people are accumulating some heavy karma that will one day come due, and I wouldn't want to be in their shoes when it does. Keep up the great work Maryanne and don't be discouraged, the work your doing now is vital for our generation and those still to come.

Expand full comment

Can’t wait until this kind of compliance is enforced to access banking…and everything else required to live.

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Welcome to the "Big Tech Inmates" club. Coming soon: forced QR Code tattoos which, when scanned, will reveal one's record of thought crimes.

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022·edited Sep 28, 2022Liked by Maryanne Demasi, PhD

My God, this censorship never gets less shocking over time. In fact if anything it’s more disturbing because no one complicit is “waking up” through the added teacher of time.

How can anyone complicit, your “peers”, anyone in science or medicine, not clearly see this modus operandi has no human benefit short term, and long term it’s certain to end badly, with the worst goals served and the greater good abandoned.

Honestly I don’t know you. But your stated actions were not only mild but correct. So you are out, and I think of who remains “in”. And they are supporting policy! Gavi, the corrupted groups on top. All this greed policy trickling down.

I appreciate your sense of relief. On the other hand what does this behemoth policy create next? And after that? I’m starting to think leaving these platforms with relief isn’t enough. Unless the collective goal of the outed then immediately shifts to some kind of activism stage 2. There has to be an organization of outed voices gathering, hammering the courts. While simultaneously hammering the alternative media, and somehow broader media, to whatever extent that’s possible, laying out to the public the implications of this censorship. The implications of these silencing policies. How these policies are not okay, but antithetical to what we’ve built towards health and good outcome.

With each event like yours that continues, we become less empowered, more weakened, less likely to turn this around as a culture. What’s happening is inconceivable. Yet left unabated, the abhorrent will become “normal”. So now is the only chance to act. That action should be last ditch, all out, there is nothing else but sink or swim.

I’m sorry this occurred but it should be step one of a new initiative. Where everyone outed goes immediately to work towards reversal. I know these ideas take time, energy, action w/in a framework that doesn’t yet exist. I’m suggesting the outed create it. Or what we are living through now is going to be a “decent period” compared to what’s to come. Thank you for your ongoing awareness of corruption, your efforts to do good, and sharing these crimes publicly.

Expand full comment
Sep 28, 2022Liked by Maryanne Demasi, PhD

I’m in LinkedIn jail at the moment... it really is pathetic.

Expand full comment

Wow, I am in good company ! Sadly LinkedIn is refusing to reinstate my account and decided that my "transgressions" were bad enough to justify the permanent ban. If anyone experienced this censorship and eventually got their account back up I would appreciate any advice on how I can appeal their decision. Kindly email me ebertvalerie777@gmail.com

Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2022·edited Oct 6, 2022

I am currently permanently banned. I was banned for a post which asks, "Is this disinformation?" and then a verbatim abstract from the journal Toxicology Reports. Same conversation you had.

If you are 'woke', you can say whatever you want to.

If you are pro mass clinical trial of new medication platforms for diseases which are generally not fatal, and of which you aren't at any major risk on probability, with no long-term safety data, you are also fine.

It has showed a few things:

1. how reliant we become over time on these platforms

2. how the woke ideology has over-taken mainstream public discourse platforms

3. that these platforms realistically have no alternatives: they are more like highways that stops

The answer is more alternative platforms.

The problem this won't solve is that people are lazy and won't move platforms.

A mass exodus (say 10-20% of it's user base) from linkedin would cause a policy shift ... it's a business.

But to where ... real free speech platforms like Gab are simply labeled extremist and people stay away.

Cheers

Expand full comment

Totally agree that this harmful censorship should be resisted and widely publicised. However, it really is a key component of the new world order strategy. Simply watching the pre-pandemic Johns Hopkins simulation confirms this. Funded by Gates, I’d be shocked if there was less censorship by Linked-In. I’m cancelling my PayPal account because they’re up to the same tricks!

Expand full comment

Hi Maryanne

This is probably not news to you but I was really pleased to see your research on our regulatory bodies featured in this Aseem Mulhotra presentation before Tess Lawrie and the World Council for Health. It came to me through Childrens Health Defense.

You are featured at the 42m 32s point. Sorry, if you already knew this.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/dr-aseem-malhotra

Expand full comment

I’m still suspended ... and it seems I have to jump through hoops to join up again.

Can’t even remember what the discussion (or argument) was about or with whom.

It’s over...

Expand full comment